R

Miriam Clements was nominated for Secretary General of the United Nations on September 30th 2016, 

with Ban Ki-Moon and the President of the General Assembly advised of this candidacy for three weeks before nominations closed.

This nomination was made while Clements was at the United Nations in New York, invited by Ban Ki-Moon 

to negotiate for Miriam’s initiatives to advance the only two existing international​ legal defenses

that hold the power to protect the Rainforest, Coral Reef and Ice Ecosystems against Industrial Contamination and Destruction.

Clements was the only Independent Nomination made for the Secretary General Position

AN INDEPENDENT SECRETARY GENERAL NOMINATION IS NOT PRECLUDED BY LAW, LETTER OR RULE 

And a two hour candidates interview was offered for arrangement by the spokesperson of the President of the General Assembly

However UN Administrators then deflected their responsibility to process the nomination of an independent candidate,

UN Administrators failed to uphold promises of a fair and transparent election by pledging allegiance only to nation state candidates 

GUTERRES NOW LEADS THE UNITED NATIONS BY DEFAULT OF A DUPLICITOUS PROCESS THAT EQUALS ELECTION FRAUD. ​ 

 

Corruption at the United Nations must be challenged. 

Miriam's nomination remains unprocessed and unresolved at the United Nations due to this election fraud.

Therefore over the next 5 years under Guterres leadership, Miriam will stand in opposition at the United Nations.

Under independent leadership, the United Nations could challenge the environmental and human rights devastation of member states; The UN could become a protector of people, a defender of ecosystems, a change agent of action and a hope for a future of peace. 

 

FOR 10 YEARS GUTERRES HAS PRESIDED OVER THE GREATEST HUMAN RIGHTS DISASTER IN HUMAN HISTORY

UNDER HIS LEADERSHIP THE UNHCR AMASSED 65 MILLION REFUGEES AND HAVE FAILED MANY OF THEM

As Secretary General Guterres has already covered up a genuine and accurate Human Rights report due to political corruption.

As Secretary General Guterres has congratulated leadership onto the UN Women's Rights Council of a country who violate women's rights.

Guterres has no solutions.

FOR 10 YEARS CLEMENTS HAS INNOVATED TO PROTECT VULNERABLE ECOSYSTEMS AND POPULATIONS FROM DESTRUCTION AND ENABLE TRANSITION

Her portfolio of work is a world-changing roadmap for the United Nations to protect life and ecosystems in equal priority to the member state economic objectives; including a strong focus to judicially prevent war and environmental destruction from dominating globally.

Miriam Clements has a powerhouse portfolio of solutions for environmental protection and peace.

OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS CLEMENTS WILL STAND IN OPPOSITION TO MAKE THE UNITED NATIONS WORK​ TO PROTECT

DEMANDING A REVOTE OR FORMAL OPPOSITION LEADERSHIP

TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL

 

Email votemiriam@anewunitednations.com to share your support

www.aNewUnitedNations.com
Miriam Clements for Secretary General Opposition - 2017 - 2021

MIRIAM CLEMENTS. for
SECRETARY GENERAL >

IN OPPOSITION AT THE UNITED NATIONS

 

00 A VIDEO INTRODUCTION

 

01 A SECRETARY GENERAL

WITH EXISTING MECHANISMS TO CHANGE EVERYTHING

The Secretary General vote can be recast to realize the following change

 

  1. Miriam Clements has a legal argument with the power to end the Syrian war, currently under review by the world’s highest judicial authority, which also profiles this court’s unique power to seize the profits of war from arms and resource beneficiaries, for reallocation to rebuild the lives of refugees.   Miriam’s legal argument clearly profiles how the world’s existing legislation can render war not-for-profit, which paves the path to potential for permanent peace.

 

  1. Miriam’s work of 10 years, encompasses powerful, pragmatic executions to prevent the escalation of industrially inflicted, environmental destruction, with four such game-changing case arguments registered and under review by the International Criminal Court.  Establishing this legal precedent would end the escalation of climate change.

 

  1. These mechanisms to prevent destruction actively force definitive transition toward sustainable and globally balanced economies, for which Miriam develops strategies which include fast-tracking necessary market shifts to establish global clean energy transition within 5 years not 34 and installations to rebuild self-sufficiency for Refugees through innovation and affordable technology; in addition to launching structures that catapult collaboration.

END THE WARS

SEIZE THE PROFITS OF WAR 

REALLOCATE WAR REVENUES FOR REFUGEES RESTITUTION

END ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

5years

5years

5years

5years

5years

5years

5years

 INSTALL INSTANT INNOVATION SOCIEITES FOR REFUGEES

FORCE LARGE-SCALE IMMEDIATE CLEAN INDUSTRY TRANSITION

PROTECT OUR ESSENTIAL ECOSYSTEMS

5years

ENABLE CLEAN ENERGY TRANSITION AT 20% p.a 

PREPARE ECONOMIES AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT TRANSITION 

5years

SEIZE THE PROFITS OF INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION 

5years

ENABLE AFFORDABLE TRANSITION TO ORGANIC NON-POISONED FOOD

5years

R

MIRIAM CLEMENTS. for
SECRETARY GENERAL >

IN OPPOSITION AT THE UNITED NATIONS

 

02 PORTFOLIO

WORLD CHANGING MECHANISMS. SEE MORE >
SQP-ICC Argument to End the War
SQP-ICC Argument to End the War
#ImagineBeauty for Refugees
#ImagineBeauty for Refugees
SQP-ICC legal context to end Environmental Destruction
SQP-ICC legal context to end Environmental Destruction
Rome Statute Interpretation Text Amendment
Rome Statute Interpretation Text Amendment
Nautre Nation - the world's newest countries to protect nature
Nautre Nation - the world's newest countries to protect nature
Dirty Industry Not for Profit Law
Dirty Industry Not for Profit Law
VICTORY AMAZON
VICTORY AMAZON
Victory Australasia
Victory Australasia
Victory Arctic
Victory Arctic
Clements Towers Exhibition
Clements Towers Exhibition
Energy Eminence
Energy Eminence
Waste Complete - Complete Waste to Energy Transition
Waste Complete - Complete Waste to Energy Transition
An Vehicle Energy and Economic Hypothesis
An Vehicle Energy and Economic Hypothesis
Bankesa
Bankesa
Collaborative Online Platform
Collaborative Online Platform

Collaborative Online Platform to facilitate widespread contribution to cases that validate the International Criminal Court for Sustainability and the application of the SQP-ICC legal context to prevent environmental destruction

Victory Arctic

On September 15th 2016, The International Criminal Court validated Miriam's cause-celeb 

legal argument for the Rome Statute's power to prevent environmental destruction - as one of the world's five worst crimes.  Against much opposition, she was correct.

Miriam has spent five years lobbying the highest levels of power to gain support for the potential of this law. 

 

To model the possibility of this law coming to life, Miriam has submitted four legal arguments to the International Criminal Court since 2013, which were accepted for review.  Three of which - to protect the rainforest, coral reefs and underground water systems - are under current review by the court, with recent evidence submissions made for each.

 

Miriam continues to develop case arguments and strategies to demonstrate how the international law she identified in 2012 - with the power to end environmental destruction - can be achieved by applying the Rome Statute to the unforeseen circumstance of industrial destruction.  This legal context has the power to vastly diminish the acceleration of climate change.  It is a world changing law.

This change can be found in the I.C.C document called 'Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritization' on page 14, under the phrase 'Case Selection Criteria'.

THE EXISTING LAW TO PREVENT THE ESCALATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE BY PROSECUTIONS AGAINST INDIVIDUALS - TO END 
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

2011-2016

#ImagineBeauty

Instant Self-Sufficient Sustainable Societies

Miriam designed and directs a strategy using innovation and technology to enable the empowered self sufficiency of Refugees - as a solution considering the international law changes that increasingly prohibit migration, the challenges with assimilation and integration and the risk of future inability to provide foreign aid for increasing refugee populations.

The #ImagineBeauty installation designs and builds new, instant, innovation societies, which utilize cost-efficient technology and solutions for developing the self-sufficiency of Refugees - providing homes, food, water and building the base for capsule societies capable of internal and external trade - in order to create a new way forward for refugees and the homeless alike.  This creates an alternative to tent cities, makeshift migrant camps and street side living.

Miriam designed the #ImagineBeauty strategy after producing the United Nations Refugee Agency

[ UNHCR ] event at the 2016 Cannes Film Festival and realized the gross deficiencies in the UNHCR's internal and external management of perhaps the greatest humanitarian crisis in human history.

Read extended summary of the #ImagineBeauty development for Refugees >

A PARADIGM SHIFT INSTALLATION TO GIVE REFUGEES A NEW WAY TO RECOVER SELF-SUFFICIENCY 

2016

The SQP-ICC legal context provides one of the most powerful and direct mechanisms to force the world's transition to clean industry.

 

Several case precedents to prevent impending harm and force accountability upon those advancing substantial destruction, will direct the corporate, banking and

high-net-worth culture of investment and development toward sustainable investment decisions.  They risk up to 30 years to life imprisonment and full personal financial forfeiture as possible penalties by the court for causing serious industrial destruction of populations and ecosystems.

 

More than five years after embarking on her mission to persuade the world that this law could change everything - the I.C.C announcing that it will prosecute environmental destruction, creates the definitive possibility prevent the escalation of climate change and force investments and decision-makers to immediately transition toward clean energy and sustainable industry.

THE LEGAL CASE PRECEDENT THAT WILL FORCE  IMMEDIATE, LARGE-SCALE AND WIDE-SPREAD TRANSITION TO CLEAN-ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRY 

2011-2016

In the 2014 paper submitted to the court, the UN, and also noted at the end of her legal arguments registered by the court, Miriam also proposed that upon the court applying this law to end environmental destruction - they should extend a separate budget to create an 'International Criminal Court for Sustainability' which would be focused entirely on preventing any further activity that brings about climate change as this is the worlds most direct mechanism to prevent and deter further destruction.

 

Miriam has focused on building a range of cases that apply this law to resolve all the major environmental challenges and to demonstrate the necessity to extend the I.C.C for a specialized division to focus on environmental destruction cases.

View a summary exert from the 2014 paper submitted to the U.N and the I.C.C >

 

THE I.C.C EXTENDED TO REALIzE AN 'INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FOR SUSTAINABILITY' TO ENSURE AGRESSIVE PURSUIT OF CASES TO END THIS CRIME

2014

Miriam has argued the International Criminal Court's power to recover the profits of industrial  developments which have caused environmental destruction since 2002 and the power of the court to order the forfeiture of the personal fortunes of private beneficiaries, whether by direct receipt, dividends or inheritance.

 

The courts application of this unique legal argument creates an otherwise non-exsistent budget to preserve and protect our most precious ecosystems and restore environmental balance for affected communities of industrial destruction.

SEIZING THE PROFITS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

2011-2016

The VICTORY AUSTRALIA campaign promotes Miriam’s case argument which the International Criminal Court accepted for review on September 14th, 2015, under review number OTP-CR-313/15, which is the only existing international legislative argument that could prevent climate change, defend the Great Barrier Coral Reef and protect other Australia ecosystems from otherwise certain demise - due to Australia’s expansion of highly contaminating coal seam gas and coal developments.

 

The argument was submitted to the court and the Queen, one week before the court accepting the case for review on Sept 14th, arguing the necessity for Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s removal from office given his conduct related to the crime of mass destruction against Australian ecosystems.  Within three days, the Queen’s representative acknowledged receipt and within 6 days of receipt - in the same hour that Tony Abbott suddenly lost his job - the International Criminal Court confirmed a formal review of my case argument against him. Except he was no longer criminally liable as he had according to this law, voluntarily abandoned the conduct of the crime, by losing his job.

 

Miriam’s current case has been updated to include alleged criminal liability against new prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and the new environmental Minister, in addition to, arguing that two of Australia’s and two of India’s biggest billionaires - Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer, Gautam Adani and GVK Reddy - would have their financial fortunes confiscated, with the court redirecting their fortunes into a trust to be used for environmental reparations -  especially for the value of the Great Barrier Reef and the communities affected by the contamination of the port expansions.

 

The next stage of the case will be a comprehensive new evidence submission to further compel the world’s highest court to formalise an investigation and trial.  The network of interest in supporting this case in Australia has enabled the development of an online forum that allows contributors from scientists, lawyers, economists, publicists, public figures, NGO’s, the public and victims - to all contribute to a comprehensive account of destruction, which this law could prevent across the world.  Contributing evidence, case or campaign work, this open source platform can mobilise those who wish to productively contribute toward change.  We are currently programming the site for use as an invaluable tool to develop this case in Australia to defend the Great Barrier Reef and the entire Australian ecosystem and ocean health,  which is threatened.

 

Miriam argues that those who are continuing to destroy our life systems, largely for private profit, amidst such high international awareness of the consequence of contamination, are those who future generations will consider history’s greatest criminals.  Understanding that those who contaminate our water, pollute our air, poison our lands and asphyxiate our ocean system which provides 50% of the world’s oxygen supply, are committing the world’s greatest crime.

Miriam's work has identified an immense apathy against ending the impunity extended to those who continue to be greatly rewarded for committing such terminal destruction - often aided by inaction and extended from the highest levels of international governance.  Having lobbied the United Nations organs on this issue for years, it appears apparent that they almost all prefer the mechanism of imposing a new global tax and trade structure on citizens and the extended economic system, which equates to a uni-polar governance tool that affords the destruction continuing.  The current climate change agreement enables those responsible to escalate their attack against the global life system without restriction or accountability by accepting disingenuous promises that directly contradict the fact that most currently violate many national and international laws that already prohibit the crime they advance whilst pledging to stop it.

 

The SQP-ICC context allows these decision makers to eliminate their criminal liability merely by abandoning their developments which will destroy, and re-investing in sustainable alternatives.  

 

Read Australian media article on Miriam's work > 

International Criminal Case Original Review Confirmation >

International Criminal Court Australian ICC Argument >

THE LEGAL CASE UNDER CURRENT REVIEW TO MODEL A 'PREVENT CLIMATE CHANGE' PRECEDENT AND DEFEND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF; IN ADDITION TO PROTECTING AGAINST THE CONTAMINATION
OF THE WATER AND AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS OF AUSTRALIA

2014

On the 14th of March 2016 - review reference number : OTP-CR-65/16 - The court accepted Miriam’s case submission made against Rafael Correa for imposing illness and ecosystem collapse upon the indigenous Shuar population of Ecuador.  This physical destruction is due to be bought about – by copper, gold and silver mining, oil extraction and hydro-electric construction, in addition to mining for Uranium, Molydenum, Thorium, Barium, Cerium, Tungsten, Niobium, Tin, Lead and Zinc -  across the land the Shuar have occupied for over 4000 years, which is development that will bring about their forced displacement or extermination.

 

Miriam argues that the importance of this unique legal construct, lies in the fact that it makes the crime preventable.  It recognises that the level of human and environmental destruction due by new dirty industrial developments in the rainforest, is a devastation that can be calculated in advance, and allows for the prosecution of those who intend or attempt to progress the destruction anyway, with the court wielding the power to stop them.

 

Clements references the fact that increasingly around the world, it is evidenced that national judicial systems are allowing the devastation of people and the compromise of ecosystems of global significance, like the rain-forest, for economic gain, in direct contradiction to promises made at events like Cop21 or pledges to support the 2030 Sustainability goals.  She proposes there is an enormous disconnect between action and reality versus public rhetoric and promises.  She implores it essential that this international court assume jurisdiction in such cases, in order to provide a defense for the people and the ecosystems, that are otherwise being fatally abused

 

Unless the Ecuadorian Government voluntarily stop the illegal mining exploitation and contamination of the Shuar rainforest land, The International Criminal Court is the only existing legal power, capable to prevent the escalation of violence and contamination that will bring about the physical destruction of the Shuar, as an insidious and measured extermination of their existence.


The contamination of ground water and tropical rainforests; the destruction of the cultural and social dynamics of the indigenous national people; the stress, intimidation, violence and murder already inflicted against them and the toxic air pollution - all due to be bought about by the developers, investors and licensors - identifies individuals who are deliberately inflicting conditions of life upon the indigenous people [ Article 6, definition c ], that is calculated [ Element 3 ] to bring about the physical destruction of one or more persons [ Element 2 ], in whole or in part; with extensive evidence of foreseeable and existing harm that demonstrates the decision-makers have awareness and knowledge of the devastation that will occur within the ordinary course of events for their industrial developments [ Article 30 ] - eliminating any need for malicious intent, and evidencing the intent and attempt to commit the crime, that is the conduct in which the criminal liability lies.  

 

The purpose of those accused is to aid, abet, provide means for its commission, otherwise assist or in any other way contribute to the attempted commission of the crime" [ Article 25 ]; demonstrating the individual in pursuit of resource, profit and GDP, is prioritizing private benefit ahead of human life, dignity and against life systems essential for human survival.

 

Article 7 defines Crimes against Humanity, which recognizes the identical crime relevant to acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack, directed against this civilian population, with those alleged criminally liable having knowledge of the attack occuring within the ordinary course of events.  Article 7.1(b) and 7.2(b) ‘Extermination’, is defined as the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to – clean water, clean air and uncontaminated soil for food - that is calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population; by attacking the natural resources essential for their survival

Click here to view the I.C.C confirmation of review >

Click to read the legal argument introduction > 

2015

DEFENDING THE CONDOR OF THE AMAZON RAIN-FOREST, IT'S PEOPLE AND PROTECTING
THE WATERSHED FOR THE
ENTIRE AMAZON BASIN 
THE I.C.C's POWER TO STOP THE RAINFOREST AND POPULATION DESTRUCTION IN BRAZIL PREVIOUSLY PROTESTED BY JAMES CAMERON, ARNOLD SCHWARWENEGGER,  SIGOURNEY WEAVER AND STING

2013-2016

On June 15th 2015 - under review number OTP-CR-214/15 - the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court accepted for review - Miriam’s legal argument to charge the directors of ROYAL DUTCH SHELL with personal criminal liability, for intending and attempting to inflict conditions of life upon the global population - and directly against the Arctic people and ecosystem - that could be calculated to bring about our physical destruction, in whole or in part; with awareness of both the circumstance and consequence of harm they would inflict, due to occur within the ordinary course of events of drilling for oil.

 

 Miriam lobbied this case to the highest level of international power, calling for them to put pressure on Shell to withdraw by leveraging the threat of their personality liability for up to 30 years to life imprisonment and full personal financial forfeiture.  The campaign was promoted as Victory Arctic and won the endorsement of prominent environmentalists.  

 

Several months later, Shell withdrew early from drilling for oil in the Arctic and have not returned, potentially abandoning billions in investment and revenues.  If they return to drill oil in the Arctic, then their personal criminal liability remains registered with the I.C.C in perpetuity, in preparation for any future action.

 

Miriam now develops a case extension against others who intend to begin committing the same criminal conduct against the Arctic ecosystem, which is so essential to the future of life on earth. 

Click to view Victory Arctic campaign >

View the International Criminal Court's case review confirmation >

View the Arctic Case Submission Introduction to the Court > 

DEFINITIVE LEGAL PROTECTION ESSENTIAL FOR THE ARCTIC ECOSYSTEM

2015

2014

THE SINGLE WORD AMENDMENT THAT WOULD ENABLE THE I.C.C TO DIRECTLY PROTECT MAJOR ECOSYSTEMS - THAT EXIST WITHOUT HUMAN POPULATIONS - FROM 
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

Miriam identified a one word change possible within the 'Elements of the Crime' text - that  is designed to guide the interpretation of the Rome Statute - which would extend protection from industrial destruction to all life groups and ecosystems.

 

In 2014, Miriam submitted a paper to the court and the United Nations, requesting their consideration of this amendment.  In each of her four case arguments registered by the court, she has argued the possibility to apply this amendment to directly defend the ecosystem without human causality.

 

Miriam has also extensively lobbied NGO's to join the commitment to request that the ICC and UN vote for an amendment to the Rome Statute 'interpretation text', that would directly protect environments like the coral reefs and rain-forest ecosystems; creating the only law that offers these ecosystems a form of international protection through enforceable criminal penalties and individual accountability of decision makers regardless of their political or corporate post or any government license signalling approval.

View a summary exert from the 2014 paper submitted to the U.N and the I.C.C >

The technology exists, that cumulatively could allow vehicles to self-generate a permanent supply of clean energy, such as solar-roofs, regenerative braking, biological batteries, super-capacitators and flywheel energy storage.  Even kinetic energy can now be harnessed from the movement of both directions - as demonstrated by existing technology used to harness  energy from both directions on a merry-go-round to store in batteries for later use.

 

Such technologies can be adapted for the future of vehicle energy and establish the premise for perpetual vehicle energy by capturing alternate forms of energy to recharge a 2nd battery, as a separate system from the primary battery powering the vehicle.

 

Vehicles powered in perpetuity by original new technology combinations, require an economic system that invites and supports their commercialization.  This will eliminate both exhaust pollution and environmental devastation from harvesting and consuming vehicle energy.   Also, so as to not crash economies by rendering vehicle energy free of charge, this requires a viable commercialization strategy to encourage the transition to this as the predominant market model or community system.   To create a market atmosphere that facilitates such intelligent transition, a new economic structure needs to be prepared.  An energy expense would no longer be incurred by citizens, therefore alternative models such as a ‘vehicle useage fee’ could be trialed and installed to remove market barriers for such technologies to evolve.


Mayors could support the exhibition of vehicle energy technology combinations and new economic structures to encourage the transition to self-sufficient vehicle systems, with combinations such as kinetic and solar with dual battery systems.  Manufacturers should be legislatively required to transition their systems and the conversion of existing cars should be incentivised and then required.  Innovative financing models will help such as affording each citizen’s cost of transition by financially structuring the cost of conversion to not exceed their normal monthly cost of fuel.

View more online >

PREPARE ECONOMIES AND MARKET SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT SUSTAINABLE TRANSITION 

2013

To enable the retention of the small farmer business model and farmers transition to premium, organic and sustainable production - it will require the financial structure of farming to be redesigned world wide with decisive action.  We must recognize that the reason toxic chemical agriculture remains the predominant model is because transition is cost prohibitive.  Resolving financial scarcity is one of the primary deterrents for farmers  evolution to sustainable practice that would significantly increase health and quality of life for the global population. Miriam observes that if the farmers had the financial incentive to transition and the psychological support to adapt, then in fact they would prefer farming sustainable, organic systems 


Miriam developed a large-scale vertically integrated, premium organic food produce market model, which facilitated in-depth research into the nature, issues and challenges of industry-wide commitment to safe, sustainable & ecological food supply.  Understanding all  stakeholders including independent farmers, corporate agriculture companies, financiers, government representatives, suppliers and market supply side companies.  Understanding each parties perspective on the determinants of performance, with limiting and driving factors to ecological adaptation has been valuable in directing the creation of feasible, realistic but visionary, stimulating strategies for immediate and measurable change in agriculture and food markets.  Navigating these various priorities, commercial fundamentals and practical difficulties, whether driven by the consumer, market, media, suppliers or producers themselves, facilitating the transformation has required positive encouragement through leadership, logic, commercial gain, asset value improvement, industry support, demonstrated success profiles, strong communication, information sharing between all parties and genuine inspiration.

 

Ultimately most industry participants want to do the right thing by the environment, food safety and people’s health, but experience regular negotiation between profit, principle & ease, when making their daily decisions that produce an ecological or unsustainable result. These decision makers need to be provided well presented credible strategies, clear implementation plans, support, empathy for financial and feasibility limitations, possible finance solutions and psychological encouragement in preference to legal force, fear, discrimination or punishment, too often the current form of pressure applied to motivate their compliance or shift.

Read more on a financial fund design called Bankesa >

THE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE THAT FACILITATES THE URGENT TRANSITION OF FOOD SYSTEMS TO ORGANIC, HEALTHY, SAFE,
 NON-POISONIOUS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SUPPLY

2008-2011

Ownership around global issues has traditionally been dominated by vertical organizations such as government agencies and nonprofits. These organizations are often constrained by the logistics, bureaucracies, and politics that mediate the way they work.   Traditionally they are inclined towards paternalistic, top-down approaches, which prohibits widespread contribution toward resolutions of the current challenges faced across the world, which are complex, decentralized, and rapidly evolving.

There is a clear opportunity to bring together the expertise scattered throughout the world and enable a bottom-up approach, in which action and impact emerges from clusters of experts and activists working together organically. The ‘who wants a revolution.com’ online platform enables these kinds of communities and help them solve world problems together.  We have engaged a rigorous approach that weaves planning, building, and learning together throughout the life-cycle of product development, to develop this collaboration site, to adapt to the development of legal defense cases, through to initiatives that enable the transition to clean energy or the restitution of refugees.

 

A unique front end visual and geo-mapped navigation, integrates with state of the art artificial intelligence and analytics programs that enable an easy to use collaborative web app for knowledge engineering, opinion capture, data visualization, decision processes and web application development. It is also a Meta web development environment which embraces and extends the World Wide Web, enabling the organization of large inputs of data, ideas, and opinions into a simple view.  It is one vast, interconnected, multi-user map of all knowledge which can be filtered, queried and visualized in user-contributable ways.  Data is contextualized, categorized, evaluated, visualizable and scriptable, all in collaboratively extensible ways.   A visual and textual, parametrically and worldview navigable space of human opinion and truth-claims which reveals points of contention and emergent consensus.

THE CONTINUITY OF WIDESPREAD COLLABORATION AND CONTRIBUTION REALISED WITHIN A BESPOKE ONLINE PLATFORM
TO ENGAGE AND EVOLVE ALL TRANSITION MECHANISMS

2008 - 2016...

CONTACT

Success! Message received.

03 Experience

MIRIAM'S LATEST WORK. SEE MORE

Miriam has argued the International Criminal Court's power to recover the profits of industrial  developments which have caused environmental destruction since 2002 and the power of the court to order the forfeiture of the personal fortunes of private beneficiaries, whether by direct receipt, dividends or inheritance.

 

The courts application of this unique legal argument creates an otherwise non-exsistent budget to preserve and protect our most precious ecosystems and restore environmental balance for affected communities of industrial destruction.

SEIZING THE PROFITS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

2011-2016

2017

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ACCEPTED MIRIAM"S CLIMATE CHANGE LEGAL ARGUMENT FOR REVIEW

On August 16th 2016

The International Criminal Court accepted

the strategic legal argument for review,

to end the Syrian war - submitted by Miriam. 

This submission titled 'May the Leaders of Great Nations Fall Before the Death of another Syrian Child' IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW BY THE COURT. 

 

Miriam argues the judicial power of the world’s highest court, to stop the leaders of the Syrian war from furthering the crime - by investigating their individual accountability for violations ranging across the five worst crimes in the world.  

 

WE AWAIT THEIR DECISION.

View International Criminal Court confirmation of review >

Request to read the introduction to the legal argument under review by the International Criminal Court >

THE JUDICIAL POWER TO
END THE SYRIAN WAR

2016

The Immediate Power to Render War Not-For-Profit

Within Miriam’s argument, she identifies existing law within the Rome Statue that allows the International Criminal Court's power to freeze and seize the profits

of war from arms dealers, defense company owners, investors, resource contract beneficiaries and the personal fortunes of those alledged criminally liable. 

These funds will be held in trust for the reparation

and restitution of the victims of the crime; 

thus enabling a budget for refugees to rebuild from revenues of the arms trade and strategic beneficiares.

When the court transition this argument from review to investigation and trial, to eliminate all profits of war - we may come to know a future of peace as war loses its primary motivators of money and resource.

FUNDS CAN BE FROZEN TOMORROW IF THE COURT TRANSITIONS FROM REVIEW TO INVESTIGATION.

122 NATIONS HAVE AN EXISTING
LEGAL AGREEMENT TO SEIZE
THE PROFITS OF THE WAR 

2016

On September 15th 2016, The International Criminal Court validated Miriam's cause-celeb 

legal argument for the Rome Statute's power to prevent environmental destruction - as one of the world's five worst crimes.  Against much opposition, she was correct.

Miriam has spent five years lobbying the highest levels of power to gain support for the potential of this law. 

 

To model the possibility of this law coming to life, Miriam has submitted four legal arguments to the International Criminal Court since 2013, which were accepted for review.  Three of which - to protect the rainforest, coral reefs and underground water systems - are under current review by the court, with recent evidence submissions made for each.

 

Miriam continues to develop case arguments and strategies to demonstrate how the international law she identified in 2012 - with the power to end environmental destruction - can be achieved by applying the Rome Statute to the unforeseen circumstance of industrial destruction.  This legal context has the power to vastly diminish the acceleration of climate change.  It is a world changing law.

This change can be found in the I.C.C document called 'Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritization' on page 14, under the phrase 'Case Selection Criteria'.

THE EXISTING LAW TO PREVENT THE ESCALATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE BY PROSECUTIONS AGAINST INDIVIDUALS - TO END 
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

2011-2016

#ImagineBeauty

Instant Self-Sufficient Sustainable Societies

Miriam designed and directs a strategy using innovation and technology to enable the empowered self sufficiency of Refugees - as a solution considering the international law changes that increasingly prohibit migration, the challenges with assimilation and integration and the risk of future inability to provide foreign aid for increasing refugee populations.

The #ImagineBeauty installation designs and builds new, instant, innovation societies, which utilize cost-efficient technology and solutions for developing the self-sufficiency of Refugees - providing homes, food, water and building the base for capsule societies capable of internal and external trade - in order to create a new way forward for refugees and the homeless alike.  This creates an alternative to tent cities, makeshift migrant camps and street side living.

Miriam designed the #ImagineBeauty strategy after producing the United Nations Refugee Agency

[ UNHCR ] event at the 2016 Cannes Film Festival and realized the gross deficiencies in the UNHCR's internal and external management of perhaps the greatest humanitarian crisis in human history.

View the website >

Read extended summary of the #ImagineBeauty development for Refugees >

A PARADIGM SHIFT INSTALLATION TO GIVE REFUGEES A NEW WAY TO RECOVER SELF-SUFFICIENCY 

2016

2014

THE SINGLE WORD AMENDMENT THAT WOULD ENABLE THE I.C.C TO DIRECTLY PROTECT MAJOR ECOSYSTEMS - THAT EXIST WITHOUT HUMAN POPULATIONS - FROM 
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION

Miriam identified a one word change possible within the 'Elements of the Crime' text - that  is designed to guide the interpretation of the Rome Statute - which would extend protection from industrial destruction to all life groups and ecosystems.

 

In 2014, Miriam submitted a paper to the court and the United Nations, requesting their consideration of this amendment.  In each of her four case arguments registered by the court, she has argued the possibility to apply this amendment to directly defend the ecosystem without human causality.

 

Miriam has also extensively lobbied NGO's to join the commitment to request that the ICC and UN vote for an amendment to the Rome Statute 'interpretation text', that would directly protect environments like the coral reefs and rain-forest ecosystems; creating the only law that offers these ecosystems a form of international protection through enforceable criminal penalties and individual accountability of decision makers regardless of their political or corporate post or any government license signalling approval.

View a summary exert from the 2014 paper submitted to the U.N and the I.C.C >

In the 2014 paper submitted to the court, the UN, and also noted at the end of her legal arguments registered by the court, Miriam also proposed that upon the court applying this law to end environmental destruction - they should extend a separate budget to create an 'International Criminal Court for Sustainability' which would be focused entirely on preventing any further activity that brings about climate change as this is the worlds most direct mechanism to prevent and deter further destruction.

 

Miriam has focused on building a range of cases that apply this law to resolve all the major environmental challenges and to demonstrate the necessity to extend the I.C.C for a specialized division to focus on environmental destruction cases.

View a summary exert from the 2014 paper submitted to the U.N and the I.C.C >

THE I.C.C EXTENDED TO REALIzE AN 'INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FOR SUSTAINABILITY' TO ENSURE AGRESSIVE PURSUIT OF CASES TO END THIS CRIME

2014

The SQP-ICC legal context provides one of the most powerful and direct mechanisms to force the world's transition to clean industry.

 

Several case precedents to prevent impending harm and force accountability upon those advancing substantial destruction, will direct the corporate, banking and

high-net-worth culture of investment and development toward sustainable investment decisions.  They risk up to 30 years to life imprisonment and full personal financial forfeiture as possible penalties by the court for causing serious industrial destruction of populations and ecosystems.

 

More than five years after embarking on her mission to persuade the world that this law could change everything - the I.C.C announcing that it will prosecute environmental destruction, creates the definitive possibility prevent the escalation of climate change and force investments and decision-makers to immediately transition toward clean energy and sustainable industry.

THE LEGAL CASE PRECEDENT THAT WILL FORCE  IMMEDIATE, LARGE-SCALE AND WIDE-SPREAD TRANSITION TO CLEAN-ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRY 

2011-2016

On the 14th of March 2016 - review reference number : OTP-CR-65/16 - The court accepted Miriam’s case submission made against Rafael Correa for imposing illness and ecosystem collapse upon the indigenous Shuar population of Ecuador.  This physical destruction is due to be bought about – by copper, gold and silver mining, oil extraction and hydro-electric construction, in addition to mining for Uranium, Molydenum, Thorium, Barium, Cerium, Tungsten, Niobium, Tin, Lead and Zinc -  across the land the Shuar have occupied for over 4000 years, which is development that will bring about their forced displacement or extermination.

 

Miriam argues that the importance of this unique legal construct, lies in the fact that it makes the crime preventable.  It recognises that the level of human and environmental destruction due by new dirty industrial developments in the rainforest, is a devastation that can be calculated in advance, and allows for the prosecution of those who intend or attempt to progress the destruction anyway, with the court wielding the power to stop them.

 

Clements references the fact that increasingly around the world, it is evidenced that national judicial systems are allowing the devastation of people and the compromise of ecosystems of global significance, like the rain-forest, for economic gain, in direct contradiction to promises made at events like Cop21 or pledges to support the 2030 Sustainability goals.  She proposes there is an enormous disconnect between action and reality versus public rhetoric and promises.  She implores it essential that this international court assume jurisdiction in such cases, in order to provide a defense for the people and the ecosystems, that are otherwise being fatally abused

 

Unless the Ecuadorian Government voluntarily stop the illegal mining exploitation and contamination of the Shuar rainforest land, The International Criminal Court is the only existing legal power, capable to prevent the escalation of violence and contamination that will bring about the physical destruction of the Shuar, as an insidious and measured extermination of their existence.


The contamination of ground water and tropical rainforests; the destruction of the cultural and social dynamics of the indigenous national people; the stress, intimidation, violence and murder already inflicted against them and the toxic air pollution - all due to be bought about by the developers, investors and licensors - identifies individuals who are deliberately inflicting conditions of life upon the indigenous people [ Article 6, definition c ], that is calculated [ Element 3 ] to bring about the physical destruction of one or more persons [ Element 2 ], in whole or in part; with extensive evidence of foreseeable and existing harm that demonstrates the decision-makers have awareness and knowledge of the devastation that will occur within the ordinary course of events for their industrial developments [ Article 30 ] - eliminating any need for malicious intent, and evidencing the intent and attempt to commit the crime, that is the conduct in which the criminal liability lies.  

 

The purpose of those accused is to aid, abet, provide means for its commission, otherwise assist or in any other way contribute to the attempted commission of the crime" [ Article 25 ]; demonstrating the individual in pursuit of resource, profit and GDP, is prioritizing private benefit ahead of human life, dignity and against life systems essential for human survival.

 

Article 7 defines Crimes against Humanity, which recognizes the identical crime relevant to acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack, directed against this civilian population, with those alleged criminally liable having knowledge of the attack occuring within the ordinary course of events.  Article 7.1(b) and 7.2(b) ‘Extermination’, is defined as the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to – clean water, clean air and uncontaminated soil for food - that is calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population; by attacking the natural resources essential for their survival

Click here to view the I.C.C confirmation of review >

Click to read the legal argument introduction > 

2015

DEFENDING THE CONDOR OF THE AMAZON RAIN-FOREST, IT'S PEOPLE AND PROTECTING
THE WATERSHED FOR THE
ENTIRE AMAZON BASIN 

The VICTORY AUSTRALIA campaign promotes Miriam’s case argument which the International Criminal Court accepted for review on September 14th, 2015, under review number OTP-CR-313/15, which is the only existing international legislative argument that could prevent climate change, defend the Great Barrier Coral Reef and protect other Australia ecosystems from otherwise certain demise - due to Australia’s expansion of highly contaminating coal seam gas and coal developments.

 

The argument was submitted to the court and the Queen, one week before the court accepting the case for review on Sept 14th, arguing the necessity for Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s removal from office given his conduct related to the crime of mass destruction against Australian ecosystems.  Within three days, the Queen’s representative acknowledged receipt and within 6 days of receipt - in the same hour that Tony Abbott suddenly lost his job - the International Criminal Court confirmed a formal review of my case argument against him. Except he was no longer criminally liable as he had according to this law, voluntarily abandoned the conduct of the crime, by losing his job.

 

Miriam’s current case has been updated to include alleged criminal liability against new prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and the new environmental Minister, in addition to, arguing that two of Australia’s and two of India’s biggest billionaires - Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer, Gautam Adani and GVK Reddy - would have their financial fortunes confiscated, with the court redirecting their fortunes into a trust to be used for environmental reparations -  especially for the value of the Great Barrier Reef and the communities affected by the contamination of the port expansions.

 

The next stage of the case will be a comprehensive new evidence submission to further compel the world’s highest court to formalise an investigation and trial.  The network of interest in supporting this case in Australia has enabled the development of an online forum that allows contributors from scientists, lawyers, economists, publicists, public figures, NGO’s, the public and victims - to all contribute to a comprehensive account of destruction, which this law could prevent across the world.  Contributing evidence, case or campaign work, this open source platform can mobilise those who wish to productively contribute toward change.  We are currently programming the site for use as an invaluable tool to develop this case in Australia to defend the Great Barrier Reef and the entire Australian ecosystem and ocean health,  which is threatened.

 

Miriam argues that those who are continuing to destroy our life systems, largely for private profit, amidst such high international awareness of the consequence of contamination, are those who future generations will consider history’s greatest criminals.  Understanding that those who contaminate our water, pollute our air, poison our lands and asphyxiate our ocean system which provides 50% of the world’s oxygen supply, are committing the world’s greatest crime.

Miriam's work has identified an immense apathy against ending the impunity extended to those who continue to be greatly rewarded for committing such terminal destruction - often aided by inaction and extended from the highest levels of international governance.  Having lobbied the United Nations organs on this issue for years, it appears apparent that they almost all prefer the mechanism of imposing a new global tax and trade structure on citizens and the extended economic system, which equates to a uni-polar governance tool that affords the destruction continuing.  The current climate change agreement enables those responsible to escalate their attack against the global life system without restriction or accountability by accepting disingenuous promises that directly contradict the fact that most currently violate many national and international laws that already prohibit the crime they advance whilst pledging to stop it.

 

The SQP-ICC context allows these decision makers to eliminate their criminal liability merely by abandoning their developments which will destroy, and re-investing in sustainable alternatives.  

 

Read Australian media article on Miriam's work > 

International Criminal Case Original Review Confirmation >

International Criminal Court Australian ICC Argument >

THE LEGAL CASE UNDER CURRENT REVIEW TO MODEL A 'PREVENT CLIMATE CHANGE' PRECEDENT AND DEFEND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF; IN ADDITION TO PROTECTING AGAINST THE CONTAMINATION
OF THE WATER AND AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS OF AUSTRALIA

2014

On June 15th 2015 - under review number OTP-CR-214/15 - the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court accepted for review - Miriam’s legal argument to charge the directors of ROYAL DUTCH SHELL with personal criminal liability, for intending and attempting to inflict conditions of life upon the global population - and directly against the Arctic people and ecosystem - that could be calculated to bring about our physical destruction, in whole or in part; with awareness of both the circumstance and consequence of harm they would inflict, due to occur within the ordinary course of events of drilling for oil.

 

 Miriam lobbied this case to the highest level of international power, calling for them to put pressure on Shell to withdraw by leveraging the threat of their personality liability for up to 30 years to life imprisonment and full personal financial forfeiture.  The campaign was promoted as Victory Arctic and won the endorsement of prominent environmentalists.  

 

Several months later, Shell withdrew early from drilling for oil in the Arctic and have not returned, potentially abandoning billions in investment and revenues.  If they return to drill oil in the Arctic, then their personal criminal liability remains registered with the I.C.C in perpetuity, in preparation for any future action.

 

Miriam now develops a case extension against others who intend to begin committing the same criminal conduct against the Arctic ecosystem, which is so essential to the future of life on earth. 

Click to view Victory Arctic campaign >

View the International Criminal Court's case review confirmation >

View the Arctic Case Submission Introduction to the Court > 

DEFINITIVE LEGAL PROTECTION ESSENTIAL FOR THE ARCTIC ECOSYSTEM

2015

Miriam first submitted a profile to the court to stop the Belo Monte hydro-dam in Brazil in 2013, as the case that clearly demonstrated the national courts unwillingness and inability to uphold the law, thus providing the International Criminal Court's right to assume jurisdiction.

 

Miriam then made multiple new submissions in 2015 and received formal registration for the case to be reviewed by the International Criminal Court on July 20th 2015, under review number OTP-CR-260/15.  

 

The most recent submission to evidence this case was made in September 2016 and is therefore currently under review since the court has publicly confirmed that they will now prosecute environmental cases. 

 

In 2012, Miriam contacted most known NGO's relevant to the Belo Monte case and invited them to help create the case argument that could bring to life the law that she had identified possible to prevent the construction of this dam and contribute to establishing a legal precedent capable to prevent climate change.  Some NGO's helped a little but none would contribute to the case or validating the law, therefore Miriam proceeded to submit the case arguments completely independently.  The campaign to promote the case was called Victory Amazon and gained celebrity support.

 

The case also included submissions also against Dilma Rousseff’s impending mass industrialization intended for the Tapajos basin - of 339 registered mining and hydro developments on land which the indigenous Munduruku people have occupied for more than a millennia.  The key development which evidenced the failure of the local court to protect and thus allowed the ICC the right to consider assuming jurisdiction, was the Tapajos hydrodam which had been openly facilitated by the court who ruled against any attempts to stop it.  The dam was already being built. The ICC is required to consult with the local member state governments on such cases, when under review.   The I.C.C court advised that they would not accept jurisdiction over the case and within a month, the Brazilian national court did a 180% change in position and ruled to cancel the license for the building of the dam.  It is possible this case compelled the shift to justice and the accountability of the national courts.

 

However, the Tapajos hydrodam, remains only one of 339 registered industrial developments planned for the Munduruku’s land with billions in economic value and revenues attached.  It is expected that the intention to assume this value will be aggressively progressed by the local and international consortium of investors and developers.

 

The case against the Belo Monte and Tapajos dams, highlight the world-wide consortium of international investors, owners and contractors involved in advancing the industrial destruction of the Amazon rainforest.

 

Otherwise lying dormant since the court entered into force in 2002, the SQP-ICC legal argument that Miriam presents, asserts the ICC’s power to determine the criminal liability of individual industrialist decision-makers, based on the calculated consequence of physical destruction that their industrial developments will foreseeably inflict against the population.  Corporate directors, politicians and investors can be all be found personally liable, when demonstratably aware that conditions of life they will inflict upon the population, will bring about a circumstance of harm.  Uniquely, the conditions of life inflicted, only need to occur within the ordinary course of events of a development they facilitate, aid or provide means for, evidenced by a manifest pattern of statements and orders issued to progress it, which is standard corporate protocol.  

 

Those alleged criminally liable have the option to voluntarily abandon their conduct and eliminate their criminal liability however, if they stayed the course, and If this case went trial and Dilma or a predominant investor - like Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase or a Blackrock director - were found guilty, then this unique body of international law could hold these individuals accountable with penalties of prison for up to 30 years to life, along with a court order for the financial forfeiture of their personal assets and wealth.  This is both a severe penalty and highly suitable for what could be described as a significant contribution to the destruction of the planet’s ecological balance, climate and ecosystem.  The suspended President’s criminality is alleged based on her intent and attempt to inflict conditions of life on local populations that are calculated to bring about their physical destruction - in whole or in part - including the forced removal of some populations from their land, with awareness of the harm that their conduct inflicts, applicable under both Article 6 and 7 of the statute.

 

Miriam points out that a legal mechanism capable of rendering new dirty industrial developments to be illegal, would be the world’s most direct mechanism to force the transition to clean energy and sustainable industry.  It would only take a few criminal convictions to inspire investors, directors and politicians to exchange their habit of destruction for sustainability and encourage decision makers to swiftly discover their ethics.   Criminalizing the destruction of the ecosystems that the world requires to sustain the survival of future generations is necessary and this law can deliver that, with no new global agreements at the UN being necessary, if they simply enforce the existing law that makes promises not to harm, legally binding.

 

Miriam states that resolving the escalation of Climate Change’ could be very simple.  If one of her four cases registered for review by the International Criminal Court progressed to investigation and trial - in order to stop developments like oil, coal, gas, uranium, nuclear and hydro, then this can prevent any further destruction of the rainforest, coral reefs, the arctic, agriculture, clean air, underground water, soils, rivers and the ocean.  Miriam suggests that if those responsible for these four devastating crimes of massive destruction, were held to justice with the court’s application of this law, then it would persuasively prevent the future of dirty industry.


With relevance to the devastation of hydro electric dams, Clements speaks of the fact that World Commission on Dams estimates that up to 80 million people are already displaced by hydro-dam developments across the world.  And compares this to the fact that the current number of registered UNHCR refugees displaced by war, number 65 million plus.  Miriam therefore suggests that conceivably hydro-dam construction has devastated more people than war in this time.  It is therefore extremely pertinent that it was Dilma Rousseff who forced the world’s agreement to register hydro-dams as clean energy by diplomatic force at the World Energy Conference in Germany, when she was still Energy Minister of Brazil in 2004.  She did so against the evidence which clearly states hydro as dirty and devastating.  Hence the case against her under review by the International Criminal Court, is very personally relevant to the wider world-wide crime that has produced such devastating displacement of indigenous people. Nelson Mandela who founded the World Commission on Dams, himself declared dams as the world’s greatest threat to the world's sustainability.

A selection of submissions have been made to the court to advance this case,each attempting slightly different arguments with new evidence profiles.   A new private submission made in September 2016;

The International Criminal Courts Original Confirmation of Case Review >

Belo Monte focused argument >

Tapajos focused argument >

Forced Displacement of River People >

Individual harm case study >

View campaign website with hand signal photos of celebrity support > 

THE I.C.C's POWER TO STOP THE RAINFOREST AND POPULATION DESTRUCTION IN BRAZIL PREVIOUSLY PROTESTED BY JAMES CAMERON, ARNOLD SCHWARWENEGGER,  SIGOURNEY WEAVER AND STING

2013-2016

Protecting our most essential major ecosystems which support human survival and animal species - including Rainforests, Coral Reefs and the Arctic -

will be governed as #NatureNation states to be recognized by the United Nations as the worlds newest countries; coupled with an international moratorium against contaminating industry as a global commitment to protect our environmental systems that sustain life, which bench-marks the International Antarctic 

Agreement.

In the Amazon rainforest, Indigenous leaders who Miriam represents, have signed a 'Declaration of Independence' document written by Clements in respresentation of Columbian Chief Taita Querubin Queta Alvarado;.  This #NatureNations 'Declaration of Independence' determines that under International

law, Indigenous people have the right to declare sovereignty over their traditional territories - as Independent or Confederated Tribes - in order to

form the world's newest country for the Amazon rainforest based on some of the worlds oldest populations living on their ancestral lands.  

 

In September 2016, 65 Indigenous leaders signed the #NatureNations Declaration of Independence for submission to Ban Ki-Moon, requesting that their admission to membership at the United Nations was

discussed during the September 2016 General Assembly.  Miriam had meetings at the UN which included discussing the #NatureNations development with the indigenous secretariat, whose job is to facilitate indigenous initiatives and yet she outright refused to communicate this indigenous request to the General Assembly as she is required to do under the rules of the General Assembly.    

The #NatureNations vision see's the amazon transitioning to a world-leading clean energy and sustainable industry nation, through protecting natural resources from extraction.  This develops a platform for peace and abundant economic opportunity within a knowledge economy; with the indigenous codifying their ancient belief system to protect nature and govern a sanctuary for life as a wisdom economy, as their law of living.

The most recent written proposition to Ban Ki-Moon on the United Nations unwillingness to administer the rules of the General Assembly.  Read here >

This letter and the Declaration has been signed by 65 indigenous chiefs >

The Declaration of Independence signed originally by 11 Indigenous chiefs and submitted to Ban Ki-moon and the Chief Secretariat of Indigenous Affairs for presentation to the General Assembly in Sept. 2016.

See here >

Domingo Ankuash, Leader of the Shuar people of Ecuador, and the leader most famed for assisting vulnerable indigenous populations to demarcate and protect their land - speaking of the NatureNations development 

> Video 1 - click here >

> Video 2 - click here >

#NatureNations Declaration of Independence written in English I Spanish I Portuguese . Read here >

Nature Nations campaign profile.  View here >

The profile of the chief who inspired the #NatureNations Development, who led the international fight to remove the patent on Ayahusca to success, for  the benefit of all indigenous people of the Amazon:

 Taita Querubin Queta Alvarado.  View here >

A REDD financial model for financing transition >

A business to assist financing transition >

A summary of the SQP rainforest protection initiatives >

#NATURENATIONS - ESTABLISHING
THE WORLDS NEWEST COUNTRIES TO PROTECT THE WORLDS MOST IMPORTANT ECOSYSTEMS

2014 - 2016...

If the world’s governments declared new local laws which determined that businesses could no longer retain their profits when generated from operations with environmental or humanitarian contamination or destruction, and when that equated to large-scale, widespread or severe harm, then the speed of transition to clean industry and sustainable energy would take place within 5 years.  Future generations life on earth would be protected.  

 

If GDP calculations would only be recognized if excluding value derived from that which causes harm, then the conversion to sustainable industry would become a global mechanism that allowed the retention of private profit and public power and eliminated all benefits that compel destructive industry.  Governments could redirect dirty industry profits to finance clean industry transition, as such preventing thousands of humanitarian crisis’s otherwise due from dirty industrial developments progressing.  

 

This mechanism compels greater honestly, than legislating to increase taxes on companies most experienced at securing large tax breaks or to force promises from those who break actual laws that require the same action as a legally binding imperative.  The climate change agreement that is predominently a tax on carbon dioxide - which is the breath of life given that humans breathe it out and the trees and ocean breathes it in - is an ironic solution for the entire world to cheerlead - especially given the fact that prior to Al Gore's movie, all science demonstrated carbon compensating for climate increases 800 years after any temperature change and as such is not responsible for causing such temperature changes, yet clearly environmental contamination is directly responsible for the devastation of our life systems. 

 

The Dirty Industry ‘ Not For Profit’ initiative allows governments to force their nations to transition to clean industry within five years, perhaps sooner.  Read more > 

THE INABILITY TO RETAIN ONE'S PROFITS FROM DIRTY INDUSTRY DERIVED REVENUE, WOULD CHANGE THE WORLD FAST AND GENUINELY PREVENT CLIMATE CHANGE

2014 - 2016...

What if all of our fuel, electricity, clean water and fertilizer generates from an elegant, small building, situated on the side of our city streets or rooftops?   ‘Energy Eminence’ multi-level, mini-towers which are 16m2 and up to 10m+ high, would adjacently integrate innovative, existing, small-scale, clean-energy technologies.  This is an installation that evolves a new economic model which invites citizens and businesses - large and small, to participate, innovate and extract value.

 

Across a city, multi-level, street-side or roof-top mini-power-towers, designed within a sustainable aesthetic, will be installed in bespoke formations - interconnected virtually - to harness the commercial potential of existing

 technology that cannot yet be commercialized within large scale industrial models of energy supply.


The Clements Towers is a utilitarian art installation that operationally demonstrates a profitable, interactive and efficient transition of existing cities toward self-sufficient, localized, decentralized, clean-energy supply.  Energy Eminence processing units can generate determined levels of energy by utilizing the new solar, plant and water processing technologies.  

 

The Energy Eminence commercialization model, enables technology to convert a city to a sustainable, renewable energy model, as resolution for two of the world’s greatest challenges.  Clements Towers installations will demonstrate an innovative mechanism for perhaps the economic, environmental and equality revolution of our time, within a utilitarian art exhibit.  It provides a compelling platform to engage and integrate multiple and diverse stakeholders to facilitate this transition.  Consequently, it enables immense global benefit by eliminating the environmental, human and geo-political harm from the harvesting and consumption of extractive industry models, which predominantly accelerate climate change; and reduces wealth inequality by decentralizing control of our dominant economic instrument.  

 

The installation concept for the Clements Towers exhibition, takes inspiration from Gustav Eiffel, who proposed the Eiffel Tower as a ‘two year’ exhibit that remained more than 125 years.  Similarly this exhibition was in tribute to ”not only the art of the modern engineer, but also the century of Industry and Science in which we are living, the great scientific movement of the eighteenth century and the Revolution of 1789”.   The Clements Towers exhibition renders the provocation of a temporary installation which can transition to permanence but establishes only as a profitable, demonstrative, innovation platform as utilitarian, operational art.  This technology reflects the great scientific movement of the 21st century 

 

The Clements Towers Exhibition situates a unique commercialization model which can define sustainable cities of the future with an original systems approach. This model engineers an optimized supply of ‘bio-fuel, bio-electricity, bio-fertilizer, closed circuit water treatment and waste-to-value product’, within a singular processing and dispensing unit. The local generation of energy outputs, within stand-alone or virtually connected, mini-power-towers, will facilitate new local jobs and innovation, a greater quality of life with sustainable living applications and its direct mechanism for environmental protection.

The exhibition is equally focus to cultivate the market-side strategy, support and finance for widespread implementation opportunities possible with a small scale, local, decentralised model.  This emerges as a significant challenge for independent clean-tech business’s attempting to commercialize and develop markets.  The public launch will center upon a local curation team; an online connectivity platform; fundraising strategies that inspire ‘culture and nature conservancy’ donations; unit design; legislative design; investment fund development to attract significant impact finance; localized, co-operative, micro or crowd finance and philanthropic ownership models; and the communications and business facilitation necessary to bring this installation of ‘the modern engineer’ to life.   

 

Co-ordination of stakeholders is tactically established within a clustered concentration of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers, service providers and institutions.   Clustering provides optimized research, innovation, installation and implementation opportunities and execution with speed, productivity and

reduced operating costs.   The central curation platform will generate new internationally distributed clusters of uniquely related business groups for alternative integrations of this innovation model, without ownership limitations; where every supplier is compartmentalized to their direct relationship to a specific set of installations. Thus allowing efficient growth and replication of the model worldwide, to transition energy supply internationally. An international roadshow will promote the proposition, for which Paris, London or New York will lead the world in demonstrating this new value paradigm.

 

Read more online >

Read a more in-depth summary >

'ENERGY EMINENCE'
IS THE MARKET MODEL THAT ENABLES THE AFFORDABLE TRANSITION OF EXISTING CITIES TO SELF-SUFFICIENT,
 LOCALIZED, DECENTRALIZED, CLEAN ENERGY - WITHIN 5 YEARS.

2013-2016...

WasteComplete processing units integrate multiple waste-to-value technologies that can transform 100% of locally generated waste into an optimized value output. This extracts an eternal life-cycle for energy and evolves the perception of waste to be considered wholly valuable, in the spirit of ancient alchemists intending to turn lead into gold, extending the value proposition of everything.

In addition to bio-fuel, bio-gas and electricity, WasteComplete will produce bio-fertilizer for transfer to inner-city organic gardens and maximize the efficiency of recycling products by extracting valuable molecules or generating 3D printed products, including unlimited innovation for sustainable solutions; such as printing homes for the homeless from waste materials recycled.


WasteComplete also provides value by eliminating disposal pollution, by allowing the decommissioning of landfills and incineration, and minimizing the transfer of waste to the ocean.

 

Multi-level, mini-power-towers, will integrate multiple small-scale, innovative, low-capacity, complimentary waste-to-value technologies, to work in combination.  These are engineered adjacently within a singular processing and dispensing unit, for optimized value outputs to be extracted from all forms of waste.  Numerous installations of the WasteComplete units across a city, then achieve economies of scale, by connecting virtually to a supervisory management centre that utilizes high-level analytics to optimize the grid for an entirely local and precision designed energy supply.

 

The Clements Towers exhibition is an innovative installation, which facilitates a sustainable supply of bio-fuel, bio-electricity, bio-fertilizer, purified water and all other possible bio-value conversions that utilize 100% of a city’s waste.  

The Clements Towers exhibition showcases a profitable, decentralized, commercialization model that could help define sustainable cities of the future.  This is an original systems approach to harnessing the immediate market value of the existing small-scale, clean-tech innovation, in order to eliminate waste and diminish the global environmental harm from harvesting and consuming energy.

 

Read more online > 

TRANISITONING 100% OF CITIES WASTE INTO ENERGY AND REUSEABLE VALUE 'WASTECOMPLETE'

2013 - 2016...